Understanding Your Attachment Style: How Early Relationships Shape Adult Love

You have probably heard people describe themselves as “anxiously attached” or “avoidant.” These terms have entered mainstream culture through social media, dating advice, and pop psychology. But beneath the labels lies a robust body of research that stretches back over sixty years, research that explains not just how we love, but why we love the way we do. Attachment theory is one of the most extensively validated frameworks in developmental and clinical psychology. And understanding your attachment style is not about putting yourself in a box. It is about recognising a pattern that was shaped long before you had any say in the matter, and discovering that the pattern can change.

What Attachment Theory Actually Says

Attachment theory was developed by British psychiatrist John Bowlby (1969, 1973, 1980), who proposed that humans are born with a biological drive to form emotional bonds with caregivers. This drive is not learned. It is innate; as fundamental as the drives for food and shelter. Bowlby argued that the quality of the earliest attachment relationship creates an “internal working model” a mental template that shapes how a person expects relationships to function for the rest of their life. If the caregiver was consistently responsive, the child develops a model that says: “I am worthy of love, and others can be trusted.” If the caregiver was inconsistent, absent, or frightening, the model adjusts accordingly. Mary Ainsworth, Bowlby’s colleague, tested this theory empirically through her now-famous Strange Situation experiments (1978). She observed how infants responded when briefly separated from their mothers, and identified three primary attachment patterns, later expanded to four:

The Four Attachment Styles

Secure Attachment

Develops when the caregiver is consistently available, responsive, and attuned to the child’s needs. In adult relationships, securely attached individuals tend to:

• Feel comfortable with intimacy and interdependence
• Communicate needs directly without excessive anxiety or avoidance
• Trust that their partner is reliable and well-intentioned
• Tolerate conflict without interpreting it as a threat to the relationship
• Recover from disagreements relatively quickly

Secure attachment is not the absence of difficulty. It is the presence of a stable internal base from which to navigate difficulty. Approximately 55–65% of adults are estimated to have a predominantly secure attachment style (Mickelson, Kessler, & Shaver, 1997).

Anxious (Preoccupied) Attachment

Develops when caregiving is inconsistent — sometimes warm and responsive, sometimes distracted, overwhelmed, or emotionally unavailable. The child cannot predict when their needs will be met, so they learn to amplify their signals: cry louder, cling harder, stay hyper-alert to the caregiver’s mood and availability. In adult relationships, anxiously attached individuals tend to:

• Crave closeness and fear rejection intensely
• Monitor their partner’s behaviour for signs of withdrawal
• Need frequent reassurance that the relationship is secure
• Become preoccupied with the relationship — thinking about it constantly
• Experience emotional highs and lows that feel tied to the partner’s responsiveness
• Have difficulty self-soothing during relational distress

This is not “neediness.” It is a nervous system that learned connection was unreliable and developed vigilance as a survival strategy.

Avoidant (Dismissive) Attachment

Develops when the caregiver is consistently emotionally unavailable, dismissive of the child’s needs, or uncomfortable with emotional closeness. The child learns that expressing need pushes people away, so they learn to suppress their attachment needs and become self-reliant. In adult relationships, avoidantly attached individuals tend to:

• Value independence highly and feel uncomfortable with too much closeness
• Minimise the importance of relationships or emotional needs
• Withdraw or shut down when a partner expresses need or distress
• Equate vulnerability with weakness
• Appear self-sufficient, but may experience loneliness or emotional flatness beneath the surface
• Have difficulty identifying or articulating their own feelings

This is not coldness. It is a nervous system that learned vulnerability was dangerous and developed independence as protection.

Disorganised (Fearful-Avoidant) Attachment

Develops when the caregiver is a source of both comfort and fear. This often occurs in contexts of abuse, severe neglect, or when the caregiver themselves is traumatised and unpredictable. The child faces an impossible dilemma: the person they need to go to for safety is also the source of threat. There is no coherent strategy available. Main and Hesse (1990) described this as “fright without solution”:  the attachment system activates, but there is no safe harbour. In adult relationships, individuals with disorganised attachment tend to:

• Experience conflicting impulses: desperately wanting closeness while simultaneously fearing it
• Oscillate between anxious and avoidant behaviours
• Find relationships chaotic, intense, and confusing
• Have difficulty with trust, emotional regulation, and self-concept
• May re-enact relational patterns from childhood without recognising them

This is often the most painful attachment pattern, and it is the one most strongly associated with complex trauma.

Nicole Lam, MA, RCC is a Registered Clinical Counsellor at Emergence Counselling & Wellness in Vancouver, BC. She specializes in attachment-based therapy, relationship anxiety, and culturally responsive counselling for BIPOC individuals. Nicole offers therapy in English and Cantonese.

Book a free consultation | Learn more about Nicole →

---

Sources:

• Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
• Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2. Separation. Basic Books.
• Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 3. Loss. Basic Books.
• Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment. Erlbaum.
• Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.
• Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parents’ unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status. In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the Preschool Years. University of Chicago Press.
• Mickelson, K. D., Kessler, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1997). Adult attachment in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 1092–1106.
• Roisman, G. I., Padrón, E., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2002). Earned-secure attachment status in retrospect and prospect. Child Development, 73(4), 1204–1219.

This is educational content based on published clinical and neuroscience research. It is not medical advice or a substitute for professional therapeutic support.